Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-500

      Disclosure: We earn money from the affiliate links to products associated with content in this article.

      Overview

      In this comparison, we will evaluate the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and the Olympus E-500, highlighting the advantages of each over the other, discussing their pros and cons, shared strengths and weaknesses, and providing a rating based on their available features and specifications to assist you in choosing the one that best suits your needs.

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C was introduced in June 2019 and Olympus E-500 was introduced in October 2005. Let us first list highlights of the models.

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C Highlights

      • 50 MP Medium format CMOS Sensor
      • 100 - 25,600 Native ISO
      • 117 Focus Points
      • 3.6" 2,360k dot Fixed Screen
      • 3,686k dot Electronic (OLED) Viewfinder
      • 2.7 fps Continuous Shooting
      • 2720 x 1530 Video Shooting
      • 30 min Video Recording Limit
      • Built-in GPS
      • Built-In Wi-Fi
      • Wheather Sealed Body

      Olympus E-500 Highlights

      • 8 MP Micro Four Thirds CCD Sensor
      • 100 - 400 Native ISO
      • 3 Focus Points
      • 2.5" 215k dot Fixed Screen
      • Optical (pentaprism) Viewfinder
      • 2.5 fps Continuous Shooting
      • Built-in Flash

      Now that we've looked at the most essential specifications and gained a basic understanding of these cameras, we can delve into more details and see the differences between them.

      Pros and Cons

      In this section we present pros and cons of Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-500.

      PROS

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      •   Video Capture
      •   Large Sensor
      •   High Resolution Sensor - 50 Megapixel
      •   High Bit Depth
      •   117 Focus Points
      •   Touch-to-Focus
      •   Live View Autofocus
      •   Touch Screen
      •   Large Screen - 3.6"
      •   High Resolution Screen - 2,360k dot
      •   High Flash Sync Speed - 1/2000 sec
      •   High DxO Overall Score - 102
      •   High USB Speed
      •   HDMI Output
      •   Built-in GPS
      •   Built-In Wi-Fi
      •   Environmental Sealing
      •   USB Charging
      •   2 Storage Slots
      •   Orientation Sensor
      •   Built-in Flash
      •   Light - 479 g (1.06 lb / 16.90 oz)
      •   Orientation Sensor

      CONS

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      •   Expensive
      •   Timelapse Recording
      •   No Face Detection
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Fixed Screen
      •   Low Max Shutter Speed (Mechanical or 1st Curtain) - 1/2000 sec
      •   Low Max Continuous Shooting - 2.7 fps
      •   Low Video Recording Limit
      •   No Built-In Bluetooth
      •   No Video Capture
      •   Small Sensor
      •   Low Resolution Sensor - 8 Megapixel
      •   400 Highest Native ISO
      •   Timelapse Recording
      •   3 Focus Points
      •   No Face Detection
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Fixed Screen
      •   Low Resolution Screen - 215k dot
      •   No Live View
      •   Low Max Continuous Shooting - 2.5 fps
      •   No HDMI Output
      •   No Built-in Microphone
      •   No Microphone Input
      •   No Headphone Output
      •   No Built-in GPS
      •   No Built-In Wi-Fi
      •   No Built-In Bluetooth
      •   No Environmental Sealing


      And here are some specifications which fall into average criteria and are neither in PROs nor in CONs category:

      AVERAGE

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      •   100 Lowest Native ISO
      •   25,600 Highest Native ISO
      •   Viewfinder Resolution - 3,686k dot
      •   Max Shutter Speed (Electronic) - 1/10000 sec
      •   Video Resolution - 2720 x 1530
      •   Weight - 766 g (1.69 lb / 27.02 oz)
      •   100 Lowest Native ISO
      •   Screen Size - 2.5"
      •   Max Shutter Speed (Mechanical or 1st Curtain) - 1/4000 sec
      •   Max Flash Sync Speed - 1/180 sec

      Advantage of Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      This section shows those features and specifications which are the reason to choose Hasselblad X1D II 50C over Olympus E-500.

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-500
      Video Capture vs
      Larger Sensor Medium format vs Micro Four Thirds
      Higher Sensor Resolution 50 Megapixel vs 8 Megapixel
      Higher Native ISO 25,600 vs 400
      Max Image Resolution 8272 x 6200 vs 3264 x 2448
      More Focus Points 117 vs 3
      Touch-to-Focus vs
      Center Autofocus vs
      Tracking Autofocus vs
      Live View Autofocus vs
      Contrast Detection for Autofocus vs
      Touch Screen vs
      Larger Screen 3.6" vs 2.5"
      Higher Resolution Screen 2,360k dot vs 215k dot
      Live View vs
      Higher Viewfinder Coverage 100% vs 95%
      Higher Viewfinder Magnification (35mm equivalent) 1.10x vs 0.45x
      Lower Min Shutter Speed 4080s vs 60 sec
      Higher Max Continuous Shooting 2.7 fps vs 2.5 fps
      Higher Flash Sync Speed 1/2000 sec vs 1/180 sec
      Multi-Segment Metering vs
      Center Weighted Metering vs
      Average Metering vs
      Spot Metering vs
      Higher USB Speed USB 3.2 Gen 1x1 (5 GBit/sec) vs USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
      HDMI Output Mini vs
      Built-in Microphone Stereo vs
      Microphone Input vs
      Headphone Output vs
      Built-in GPS vs
      Built-In Wi-Fi vs
      Environmental Sealing vs
      More Storage Slots 2 vs 1

      Check out other cameras which are frequently compared to Hasselblad X1D II 50C.

      Advantage of Olympus E-500

      This section shows those features and specifications which are the reason to choose Olympus E-500 over Hasselblad X1D II 50C.

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-500
      Phase Detection for Autofocus vs
      Higher Max Shutter Speed (Mechanical or 1st Curtain) 1/2000 sec vs 1/4000 sec
      Built-in Flash vs
      Lighter 766 g (1.69 lb / 27.02 oz) vs 479 g (1.06 lb / 16.90 oz)

      Check out other cameras which are frequently compared to Olympus E-500.

      Common Strengths and Weaknesses

      We already listed pros and cons of each model. However, you may also find useful to look at their common strengths and weaknesses shown side-by-side.

      STRENGTHS Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus E-500
        Orientation Sensor
      WEAKNESSES Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus E-500
        Timelapse Recording
        No Face Detection
        No Image Stabilization
        Screen TypeFixedFixed
        Low Max Continuous Shooting2.7 fps2.5 fps
        No Built-In Bluetooth

      Screen and Viewfinder

      Screen

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C has a 3.6" screen with 2,360k dot resolution and Olympus E-500 has a 2.5" screen with 215k dot resolution. Both have Fixed screens. Hasselblad X1D II 50C also features touchscreen which has advantages such as easy menu navigation, intuitive controls, quick setting adjustment and most importantly a Touch-to-Focus functionality allowing users to select a specific point on the screen where they want the camera to focus. This feature can be helpful for achieving precise focus in both photo and video recording.


      Viewfinder

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C has a built-in Electronic (OLED) viewfinder with 3,686k dot resolution and Olympus E-500 has a built-in Optical (pentaprism) viewfinder. Hasselblad X1D II 50C has 100% coverage with 0.87x (1.10x 35mm equivalent) magnification and Olympus E-500 has 95% coverage with 0.90x (0.45x 35mm equivalent) magnification.

      Sensor

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C features a 50 megapixel Medium format CMOS sensor with dimensions of 43.8 x 32.9 mm and a total area of 1441 mm2. Its native ISO range is 100 - 25,600. Olympus E-500 features a 8 megapixel Micro Four Thirds CCD sensor with dimensions of 17.3 x 13 mm and a total area of 169 mm2. Its native ISO range is 100 - 400 and expands to 100 - 1,600 in boosted mode.


      Here is a sensor size comparison chart where you can see how different sensors compare with each other:

      Sensor size chart
      Sensor Dimensions Area Aspect Ratio Crop Factor
      Image cannot be displayedMedium Format44 x 33 mm1452 mm24:30.79x
      Image cannot be displayedFull Frame36 x 24 mm864 mm23:21x
      Image cannot be displayedAPS-H27 x 18 mm486 mm23:21.3x
      Image cannot be displayedAPS-C23.6 x 15.6 mm368.2 mm23:21.5x
      Image cannot be displayedAPS-C (Canon)22.3 x 14.9 mm332.3 mm23:21.6x
      Image cannot be displayedMicro Four Thirds17.4 x 13 mm226.2 mm24:32x
      Image cannot be displayed1-inch13.2 x 8.8 mm116.2 mm23:22.7x
      Image cannot be displayed1/1.7-inch7.44 x 5.58 mm41.5 mm24:34.7x
      Image cannot be displayed1/2.3-inch6.17 x 4.55 mm28.1 mm24:35.6x

      Photography Features

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C can take pictures up to 8272 x 6200 resolution. Olympus E-500 can take pictures up to 3264 x 2448 resolution. It can also take pictures with lower resolution like 3200 x 2400, 2560 x 1920, 1600 x 1200, 1280 x 960, 1024 x 768, 640 x 480 with 4:3 aspect ratios.


      Lens Mount

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C has Hasselblad X lens mount and Olympus E-500 has Four Thirds lens mount. Due to Medium format sensor in Hasselblad X1D II 50C its crop factor is equal to 0.79x, this means that a 35mm equivalent focal length of the mounted lens will be equal to its actual focal length times 0.79. Due to Micro Four Thirds sensor in Olympus E-500 its crop factor is equal to 2x, this means that a 35mm equivalent focal length of the mounted lens will be equal to its actual focal length times 2.


      No Image Stabilization

      The cameras do not have image stabilization. On Hasselblad X1D II 50C it means that you need lenses with optical image stabilization for vibration reduction. As for Olympus E-500 nothing can be done. On Olympus E-500 it means that you need lenses with optical image stabilization for vibration reduction. As for Hasselblad X1D II 50C nothing can be done.

      Connectivity, Battery and Storage

      Built-in GPS on Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C has a built-in GPS (Global Positioning System) technology which allows you to automatically tag the location where you took your photos. You can later categorize, organize, and search for photos based on location. This is very useful for travel and outdoor photographers for documenting the locations where images were captured.
        Check out the cameras in our database that have built-in GPS.


      Built-in Wi-Fi on Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C has a built-in Wi-Fi (Wi-Fi 5, 802.11ac/b/g/n, 2.4/5 GHz) which allows to easily transfer photos and videos from the camera to other Wi-Fi-enabled devices, such as smartphones, tablets, printers, or computers. This eliminates the need for cables and allows for quick and convenient media sharing and social media integration. It gives you the ability to control your camera remotely using a smartphone or tablet. This is particularly useful for taking self-portraits, group shots, or capturing images in challenging conditions without having to touch the camera. Firmware updates can also be downloaded and installed wirelessly.
        Check out the cameras in our database that have built-in WiFi.


      USB Inputs and HDMI Outputs

      Both models have USB inputs for data transfer. connector for video signal output.


      External Storage Slots

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C has Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II) card slots. Olympus E-500 has a single Compact Flash (Type I/II), xD Picture Card card slot.

      Other Features

      Shutter

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C has Electronic shutter and Leaf shutter. Shutter speed can go up to 1/10000 sec with electronic shutter and up to 1/2000 sec with mechanical shutter on Hasselblad X1D II 50C, and up to 1/4000 sec on Olympus E-500. Hasselblad X1D II 50C can shoot continuously up to 2.7 fps. Olympus E-500 can shoot continuously up to 2.5 fps.


      Flash

      Olympus E-500 has a built-in flash with maximum range of 13.00 m at ISO 100 and also accepts external flash. Hasselblad X1D II 50C has no built-in flash but an external flash may be connected via Hot Shoe. The fastest flash synchronization speed is 1/2000 sec on Hasselblad X1D II 50C and 1/180 sec on Olympus E-500.

      Physical Parameters

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C body has dimensions of 148 x 97 x 70 mm (5.83 x 3.82 x 2.76") and Olympus E-500 body has dimensions of 130 x 95 x 66 mm (5.12 x 3.74 x 2.6"). Hasselblad X1D II 50C weighs 766 g (1.69 lb / 27.02 oz) and Olympus E-500 weighs 479 g (1.06 lb / 16.90 oz).

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      148 mm

      97 mm

      Image cannot be displayed

      130 mm

      95 mm

      Image cannot be displayed


      97 mm

      Image cannot be displayed

      95 mm

      Image cannot be displayed

      Size comparisons of Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-500

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-500 for Different Types of Photography

      We give scores to the cameras for six types of photography based on their features and specifications. Let us see how suitable they are for each type of photography.

      Landscape Photography

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      EXCELLENT
      97
      •   Large Sensor
      •   Touch Screen
      •   High Resolution Screen - 2,360k dot
      •   Built-in GPS
      •   Environmental Sealing
      POOR
      50
      •   Small Sensor
      •   Low Resolution Screen - 215k dot
      •   No Live View
      •   No Built-in GPS
      •   No Environmental Sealing

      Sports Photography

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      GOOD
      79
      •   25,600 Highest Native ISO
      •   117 Focus Points
      •   Touch-to-Focus
      •   No Face Detection
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Touch Screen
      •   High Resolution Screen - 2,360k dot
      •   Viewfinder Resolution - 3,686k dot
      •   Low Max Continuous Shooting - 2.7 fps
      •   2 Storage Slots
      •   Orientation Sensor
      POOR
      53
      •   400 Highest Native ISO
      •   3 Focus Points
      •   No Face Detection
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Low Resolution Screen - 215k dot
      •   No Live View
      •   Low Max Continuous Shooting - 2.5 fps
      •   Orientation Sensor

      Wildlife Photography

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      GOOD
      79
      •   25,600 Highest Native ISO
      •   117 Focus Points
      •   Touch-to-Focus
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Touch Screen
      •   High Resolution Screen - 2,360k dot
      •   Viewfinder Resolution - 3,686k dot
      •   Low Max Continuous Shooting - 2.7 fps
      •   Environmental Sealing
      •   2 Storage Slots
      •   Orientation Sensor
      POOR
      51
      •   400 Highest Native ISO
      •   3 Focus Points
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Low Resolution Screen - 215k dot
      •   No Live View
      •   Low Max Continuous Shooting - 2.5 fps
      •   No Environmental Sealing
      •   Orientation Sensor

      Portrait Photography

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      EXCELLENT
      88
      •   Large Sensor
      •   117 Focus Points
      •   Touch-to-Focus
      •   No Face Detection
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Touch Screen
      •   Large Screen - 3.6"
      •   High Resolution Screen - 2,360k dot
      •   High Flash Sync Speed - 1/2000 sec
      •   Orientation Sensor
      AVERAGE
      64
      •   Small Sensor
      •   3 Focus Points
      •   No Face Detection
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Screen Size - 2.5"
      •   Low Resolution Screen - 215k dot
      •   No Live View
      •   Max Flash Sync Speed - 1/180 sec
      •   Orientation Sensor

      Street Photography

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      EXCELLENT
      88
      •   Large Sensor
      •   117 Focus Points
      •   Touch-to-Focus
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Fixed Screen
      •   Touch Screen
      •   High Resolution Screen - 2,360k dot
      •   Built-in GPS
      •   Environmental Sealing
      •   Weight - 766 g (1.69 lb / 27.02 oz)
      GOOD
      76
      •   Small Sensor
      •   3 Focus Points
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Fixed Screen
      •   Low Resolution Screen - 215k dot
      •   No Live View
      •   No Built-in GPS
      •   No Environmental Sealing
      •   Light - 479 g (1.06 lb / 16.90 oz)

      Travel Photography

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      EXCELLENT
      85
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Fixed Screen
      •   Touch Screen
      •   High Resolution Screen - 2,360k dot
      •   Video Resolution - 2720 x 1530
      •   Low Video Recording Limit
      •   Built-in GPS
      •   Environmental Sealing
      •   Weight - 766 g (1.69 lb / 27.02 oz)
      GOOD
      81
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Fixed Screen
      •   Low Resolution Screen - 215k dot
      •   No Built-in GPS
      •   No Environmental Sealing
      •   Light - 479 g (1.06 lb / 16.90 oz)

      Evaluations

      We evaluate Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-500 and give them scores of 78 and 51 out of 100 recpectively. We also give separate scores for 7 different categories according to the available features and specifications some of which are listed below. These evaluations are relative and may change each time a new camera is added to the database.


      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      OVERALL
      78
      OVERALL
      51

      Sensor

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      GOOD
      82
      •   Large Sensor
      •   High Resolution Sensor - 50 Megapixel
      •   100 Lowest Native ISO
      •   25,600 Highest Native ISO
      •   High DxO Overall Score - 102
      POOR
      54
      •   Small Sensor
      •   Low Resolution Sensor - 8 Megapixel
      •   100 Lowest Native ISO
      •   400 Highest Native ISO

      Photo

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      GOOD
      72
      •   High Bit Depth
      •   Timelapse Recording
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Low Max Shutter Speed (Mechanical or 1st Curtain) - 1/2000 sec
      •   Max Shutter Speed (Electronic) - 1/10000 sec
      •   Low Max Continuous Shooting - 2.7 fps
      •   High Flash Sync Speed - 1/2000 sec
      POOR
      52
      •   Timelapse Recording
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Max Shutter Speed (Mechanical or 1st Curtain) - 1/4000 sec
      •   Low Max Continuous Shooting - 2.5 fps
      •   Max Flash Sync Speed - 1/180 sec

      Video

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      BAD
      25
      •   No Image Stabilization
      •   Video Resolution - 2720 x 1530
      •   Low Video Recording Limit
      BAD
      0
      •   No Image Stabilization

      Focusing

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      GOOD
      77
      •   117 Focus Points
      •   Touch-to-Focus
      •   No Face Detection
      •   Live View Autofocus
      AVERAGE
      69
      •   3 Focus Points
      •   No Face Detection

      Screen and Viewfinder

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      GOOD
      84
      •   Fixed Screen
      •   Touch Screen
      •   Large Screen - 3.6"
      •   High Resolution Screen - 2,360k dot
      •   Viewfinder Resolution - 3,686k dot
      AVERAGE
      67
      •   Fixed Screen
      •   Screen Size - 2.5"
      •   Low Resolution Screen - 215k dot

      Connectivity

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      EXCELLENT
      94
      •   High USB Speed
      •   HDMI Output
      •   Built-in GPS
      •   Built-In Wi-Fi
      •   No Built-In Bluetooth
      POOR
      40
      •   No HDMI Output
      •   No Built-in Microphone
      •   No Microphone Input
      •   No Headphone Output
      •   No Built-in GPS
      •   No Built-In Wi-Fi
      •   No Built-In Bluetooth

      Battery, Storage and Physical

      Hasselblad X1D II 50C

      Olympus E-500

      GOOD
      84
      •   Environmental Sealing
      •   Weight - 766 g (1.69 lb / 27.02 oz)
      •   2 Storage Slots
      POOR
      44
      •   No Environmental Sealing
      •   Light - 479 g (1.06 lb / 16.90 oz)


      For a full specification list please go to the specifications page:

      Amazon Affiliate Disclosure
      ZKelectronics is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for website owners to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon (.com, .co.uk, .ca, etc) and any other websites that may be affiliated with Amazon Service LLC Associates Program.